Jumping into recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of discriminatory and responsive force plate parameters in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during countermovement and drop jumps.

Purpose: Comprehensive understanding of force plate parameters distinguishing individuals postprimary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) from healthy controls during countermovement jumps (CMJ) and/or drop jumps (DJ) is lacking. This review addresses this gap by identifying discriminative force plate parameters and examining changes over time in individuals post-ACLR during CMJ and/or DJ. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta analyses following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine databases were searched from inception to March 2022. We included cross-sectional papers comparing post-ACLR with healthy controls or longitudinal studies of individuals at least 6 months postprimary ACLR while performing CMJ and/or DJ on force plates. The methodological quality was appraised using the Modified Downs and Black Checklist. Results: Thirty-three studies including 1185 (50.38%) participants post-ACLR, and 1167 (49.62%) healthy controls, were included. Data were categorised into single-leg CMJ, double-leg CMJ, single-leg DJ, and double-leg DJ. Jump height was reduced in both single (mean difference [MD] = -3.13; p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-4.12, -2.15]) and double-leg (MD = -4.24; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [-5.14, -3.34]) CMJs amongst individuals with ACLR. Similarly, concentric impulse and eccentric/concentric impulse asymmetry could distinguish between ACLR (MD = 3.42; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [2.19, 4.64]) and non-ACLR (MD = 5.82; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [4.80, 6.80]) individuals. In double-leg DJs, peak vertical ground reaction forces were lower in the involved side (MD = -0.10; p = 0.03; 95% CI: [-0.18, -0.01]) but higher in the uninvolved side (MD = 0.15; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [0.10, 0.20]) when compared to controls and demonstrated significant changes between 6 months and 3 years post-ACLR. Conclusion: This study identified discriminative kinetic parameters when comparing individuals with and without ACLR and also monitored neuromuscular function post-ACLR. Due to heterogeneity, a combination of parameters may be required to better identify functional deficits post-ACLR. Level of Evidence: Level III.

A comparison of stiffness of six knee braces with application for posterolateral corner reconstructions.

Posterolateral corner knee injuries are clinically significant, and often require surgical reconstruction. The optimal knee brace following posterolateral corner reconstructions has not yet been determined via clinical nor biomechanical study. We sought to evaluate the stiffness of six types of knee braces to determine the ideal brace type for reducing varus forces, which may have clinical utility for posterolateral corner knee reconstruction rehabilitation. Six different groups of knee braces underwent mechanical testing: cruciate braces, cruciate braces with a valgus bend, medial unloaders, articulating sleeves, hinged braces, and tri-panel immobilizers. Each brace was fitted to the same fiberglass leg model and was secured to the testing apparatus. Force was applied under four-point bending to generate a varus moment about the artificial knee. The stiffness in Newtons per millimeter (N/mm) of each brace was calculated from the slope of the force-displacement curve. The cruciate brace with a valgus bend had the highest average stiffness at 192.61 N/mm (SD 28.53). The articulating sleeve was the least stiff with an average stiffness of 49.86 N/mm (SD 8.99). Stiffness of the cruciate brace was not statistically different compared to cruciate valgus (p = 0.083) or medial unloader (p = 0.098). In this experimental design, a cruciate brace with a valgus bend was shown to have the highest overall stiffness, while an articulating sleeve had the lowest stiffness. Future work will investigate whether this translates into clinical performance.

Elective surgery in ankle and foot disorders-best practices for management of pain: a guideline for clinicians.

PURPOSE: Complex elective foot and ankle surgeries are often associated with severe pain pre- and postoperatively. When inadequately managed, chronic postsurgical pain and long-term opioid use can result. As no standards currently exist, we aimed to develop best practice pain management guidelines. METHODS: A local steering committee (n = 16) surveyed 116 North American foot and ankle surgeons to understand the "current state" of practice. A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 35) was then formed consisting of orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, chronic pain physicians, primary care physicians, pharmacists, registered nurses, physiotherapists, and clinical psychologists. Each expert provided up to three pain management recommendations for each of the presurgery, intraoperative, inpatient postoperative, and postdischarge periods. These preliminary recommendations were reduced, refined, and sent to the expert panel and "current state" survey respondents to create a consensus document using a Delphi process conducted from September to December 2020. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred and five preliminary statements were summarized into 51 statements. Strong consensus (≥ 80% respondent agreement) was achieved in 53% of statements including the following: postsurgical opioid use risk should be assessed preoperatively; opioid-naïve patients should not start opioids preoperatively unless non-opioid multimodal analgesia fails; and if opioids are prescribed at discharge, patients should receive education regarding importance of tapering opioid use. There was no consensus regarding opioid weaning preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Using multidisciplinary experts and a Delphi process, strong consensus was achieved in many areas, showing considerable agreement despite limited evidence for standardized pain management in patients undergoing complex elective foot and ankle surgery. No consensus on important issues related to opioid prescribing and cessation highlights the need for research to determine best practice.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les chirurgies électives complexes du pied et de la cheville sont souvent associées à une douleur intense avant et après l'opération. Lorsque cette douleur est mal prise en charge, elle peut entraîner une douleur postopératoire chronique et une consommation d'opioïdes à long terme. Comme il n'existe actuellement aucune norme, nous avons cherché à élaborer des lignes directrices sur les meilleures pratiques en matière de prise en charge de la douleur. MéTHODE: Un comité directeur local (n = 16) a interrogé 116 chirurgiens nord-américains spécialistes du pied et de la cheville pour comprendre « l'état actuel ¼ de la pratique. Un groupe d'experts multidisciplinaire (n = 35) a ensuite été formé, composé de chirurgiens orthopédistes, d'anesthésiologistes, de médecins spécialistes de la douleur chronique, de médecins de soins primaires, de pharmaciens, d'infirmières autorisées, de physiothérapeutes et de psychologues cliniciens. Chaque expert a fourni jusqu'à trois recommandations de prise en charge de la douleur pour chacune des périodes suivantes : en préchirurgie, en peropératoire, pendant l'hospitalisation postopératoire et après le congé. Ces recommandations préliminaires ont été réduites, affinées et envoyées au groupe d'experts et aux répondants du sondage sur « l'état actuel ¼ afin de créer un document de consensus à l'aide d'une méthode de Delphi réalisée entre septembre et décembre 2020. RéSULTATS: Mille quatre cent cinq déclarations préliminaires ont été résumées en 51 énoncés. Un consensus fort (≥ 80 % des répondants étaient d'accord) a été atteint concernant 53 % des énoncés, notamment les suivants : le risque de consommation postopératoire d'opioïdes devrait être évalué avant l'opération; les patients naïfs aux opioïdes ne devraient pas commencer à prendre des opioïdes avant l'opération, à moins que l'analgésie multimodale non opioïde n'échoue; et si des opioïdes sont prescrits au congé, les patients devraient être informés de l'importance de réduire leur consommation d'opioïdes. Il n'y avait pas de consensus concernant le sevrage des opioïdes en période préopératoire. CONCLUSION: À l'aide d'experts multidisciplinaires et d'une méthode de Delphi, un fort consensus a été atteint dans de nombreux aspects, montrant un accord considérable malgré des données probantes limitées pour une prise en charge standardisée de la douleur chez les patients subissant une chirurgie élective complexe du pied et de la cheville. L'absence de consensus sur des questions importantes liées à la prescription et à l'interruption des opioïdes souligne la nécessité de recherches pour déterminer les pratiques exemplaires.

Participant Exercise-Session Attendance in Community-Based, Bridging, and Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Background: A paucity of studies have investigated participant attendance in community-based and hybrid cardiac rehabilitation programs in the Canadian setting. We compared exercise-session attendance of community-based, bridging (hospital plus community-based), and hospital-based participants who attended a high-volume cardiac rehabilitation program in Alberta, Canada. Methods: Exercise sessions attended and participant characteristics were collected and analyzed from 230 records of patients who attended cardiac rehabilitation between 2016 and 2019. Community-based (n = 74) and bridging (n = 41) program participants were age- and sex-matched in a 1:1 ratio to hospital-based participants. The number of exercise sessions attended was compared among program groups, between female and male patients, and for patients with vs without cardiac surgery. The percentage of exercise sessions attended was also compared among program groups. Results: Bridging participants attended the greatest number of exercise sessions (median = 10.0 sessions) and demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of sessions attended (91%, 25th and 75th percentile interquartile range [IQR] = 64, 100%) than matched hospital participants (median = 6.0 sessions; 63%, 25, 75 IQR = 13, 94%; P = 0.01). Percentage of sessions attended did not differ for bridging and community-based participants (P = 0.30). Exercise-session attendance was similar for community-based participants (median = 6.0 sessions; 75%, 25, 75 IQR = 38%, 88%) vs their hospital matches (median = 6.0 sessions; 81%, 25, 75 IQR = 38%, 100%; P ≥ 0.37), as well as for female vs male patients (median = 7.0 sessions for both sexes; P = 0.66), and for surgical vs nonsurgical patients (median = 7.0 sessions; P = 0.48). Female patients in the bridging program attended significantly more exercise sessions in the community, compared with male patients in the bridging program (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Bridging participants attended the most exercise sessions overall and demonstrated a higher percentage attendance than hospital-based participants. These results suggest that a hybrid program consisting of hospital and community-based exercise was favourable for exercise-session attendance. Given modern approaches to de-medicalize cardiac rehabilitation, our findings further support the provision of community program offerings, without detriment to patient session attendance.

Introduction: Peu d'études ont porté sur la participation des patients aux programmes communautaires ou hydrides de réadaptation cardiaque du Canada. Nous avons comparé la participation des patients aux séances d'entraînement en milieu communautaire, de transition (en milieu hospitalier et milieu communautaire) et en milieu hospitalier d'un programme de réadaptation cardiaque à volume élevé de l'Alberta, au Canada. Méthodes: Nous avons collecté et analysé les données sur les séances d'entraînement suivies et les caractéristiques des participants provenant de 230 dossiers de patients qui avaient participé à la réadaptation cardiaque entre 2016 et 2019. Les participants du programme en milieu communautaire (n = 74) et du programme de transition (n = 41) ont été appariés par âge et sexe aux participants du programme en milieu hospitalier selon un ratio 1:1. Le nombre de séances d'entraînement suivies a été comparé entre les groupes du programme, entre les patientes et les patients, et entre les patients qui avaient subi ou non une chirurgie cardiaque. Le pourcentage des séances d'entraînement suivies a aussi été comparé entre les groupes du programme. Résultats: Les participants du programme de transition ont assisté au plus grand nombre de séances d'entraînement (médiane = 10,0 séances) et ont démontré un pourcentage significativement plus élevé de séances suivies (91 %, 25e et 75e percentile [25, 75] intervalle interquartile [IIQ] = 64, 100 %) que les participants appariés du programme en milieu hospitalier (médiane = 6,0 séances; 63 %, 25, 75 IIQ = 13, 94 %; P = 0,01). Le pourcentage de séances suivies ne différait pas entre les participants du programme de transition et les participants du programme en milieu communautaire (P = 0,30). La participation aux séances d'entraînement était similaire entre les participants du programme en milieu communautaire (médiane = 6,0 séances; 75 %, 25, 75 IIQ = 38 %, 88 %) et les participants appariés du programme en milieu hospitalier (médiane = 6,0 séances; 81 %, 25, 75 IIQ = 38 %, 100 %; P ≥ 0,37), de même qu'entre les patientes et les patients (médiane = 7,0 séances pour les deux sexes; P = 0,66), et les patients opérés et les patients non opérés (médiane = 7,0 séances; P = 0,48). Les patientes du programme de transition ont participé à un nombre plus important de séances d'entraînement en milieu communautaire que les patients du programme de transition (P = 0,02). Conclusions: Les participants du programme de transition ont dans l'ensemble assisté à la plupart des séances d'entraînement et ont démontré un pourcentage plus élevé de participation que les participants du programme en milieu hospitalier. Ces résultats indiquent qu'un programme hybride qui consiste en un entraînement en milieu hospitalier et en milieu communautaire favorisait la participation aux séances d'entraînement. Compte tenu des approches contemporaines de démédicalisation de la réadaptation cardiaque, nos conclusions justifient d'autant plus la mise à disposition de programmes en milieu communautaire, et ce, sans compromettre la participation des patients aux séances.

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches.

PURPOSE: Our primary objectives were to (1) describe current approaches for kinetic measurements in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) suggest considerations for methodological reporting. Secondarily, we explored the relationship between kinetic measurement system findings and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: We followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley's 6-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2020. Original research papers reporting parameters measured by kinetic measurement systems in individuals at least 6-months post primary ACLR were included. RESULTS: In 158 included studies, 7 kinetic measurement systems (force plates, balance platforms, pressure mats, force-measuring treadmills, Wii balance boards, contact mats connected to jump systems, and single-sensor insoles) were identified 4 main movement categories (landing/jumping, standing balance, gait, and other functional tasks). Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the methods used and outcomes assessed; this review highlighted common methodological reporting gaps for essential items related to movement tasks, kinetic system features, justification and operationalization of selected outcome parameters, participant preparation, and testing protocol details. Accordingly, we suggest considerations for methodological reporting in future research. Only 6 studies included PROMs with inconsistency in the reported parameters and/or PROMs. CONCLUSION: Clear and accurate reporting is vital to facilitate cross-study comparisons and improve the clinical application of kinetic measurement systems after ACLR. Based on the current evidence, we suggest methodological considerations to guide reporting in future research. Future studies are needed to examine potential correlations between kinetic parameters and PROMs.